Juris Publishes CommLaw Group Treatise on U.S. Regulatory Regime


Marashlian & Donahue, LLC, The CommLaw Group, is pleased to announce the availability of its treatise on the United States regulatory framework applicable to Communications Service providers, Broadcasters and other entities subject to the regulatory jurisdiction of the Federal Communications Commission.  The publication is available through Juris (link below) and is published in association with the Center for International Legal Studies (“CILS”):

United States – International Telecommunications Law – 2nd Edition

Following is an introductory synopsis of the treatise:

Trends and Themes in Telecommunications Law and Policy

Historically, American telecommunications policy had been one of regulation of a perceived natural monopoly, ‘siloed’ regulatory regimes, and reaction to technological change. Telephone services were believed to be a natural monopoly. Government regulators tolerated that monopoly because universal access to telephony was perceived to be in the public interest.

In addition, since both the broadcast and the telephone industries relied upon entirely different physical networks, regulators believed that these telecommunications industries must be regulated independently. This regulatory framework evolved into what is commonly described as the ‘silo’ approach to regulation, depicted below.

Although the current regulatory regime continues to adhere to these ‘silos,’ the walls of each silo have been rapidly eroding since the passage of the Telecommunications Act of 1996.2 The 1996 Act focused on cultivating market competition through deregulation, and tacitly acknowledged the convergence of telecommunications technologies. In the years since the 1996 Act’s passage, the deregulatory principles embodied in the Act, combined with unparalleled advances in communications and information processing technologies, have strained the long-term viability of the silo regulatory model.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING DISCLAIMER: This information may be considered advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers

Sign Up To Receive Our
Advisories and Compliance Alerts

Sign up for our email list to receive notifications regarding new advisories and news